Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 23-1438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH, DALE C. SMITH and others
AURSBY v. LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2019cv04849
Defendant:
SHAWN WIELAGE, ERIC FRIES, WARREN M. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LAMAR AURSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of New Mexico, et al v. Aamodt, et al
as 17-2147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. State Engineer
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUEBLO DE NAMBE, PUEBLO DE POJOAQUE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NANSY CARSON, PAUL DOTSON, HELEN RINKE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA FE COUNTY, RIO DE TESUQUE ASSOCIATION, INC. and CITY OF SANTA FE
Appellant:
BG & CO, LLC, MARIE BERNARD, CLARA DEMARIA and others
State of New Mexico, et al v. Aamodt, et al
as 17-2147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. State Engineer
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUEBLO DE NAMBE, PUEBLO DE POJOAQUE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NANSY CARSON, PAUL DOTSON, HELEN RINKE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTA FE COUNTY, RIO DE TESUQUE ASSOCIATION, INC. and CITY OF SANTA FE
Appellant:
BG & CO, LLC, MARIE BERNARD, CLARA DEMARIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Donald J. Ulrich Associates, Inc. v. Molded Fiber Glass Companies
as 1:2007mc00044
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Ulrich Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Molded Fiber Glass Companies
Movant:
Stuart Cordell and Warren and Young
Warren F. Young, et al. v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as FLS/1:99-CV-01399
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Warren F. Young
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
