Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Frank Heindel v. Marci Andino
as 19-1204
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT MOSELY, Member of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, BILLY WAY, JR., Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in his official capacity, MARCI ANDINO, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK HEINDEL and PHIL P. LEVENTIS
Amicus Curiae:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, Secretary of State for New Mexico, DUNCAN A. BUELL, Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering and NCR Chair of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, JOSEPH R. KINIRY, Principal Scientist, Galois, and Principled CEO and Chief Scientist, Free & Fair and others
GUILFORD COLLEGE et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, THE NEW SCHOOL, GUILFORD COLLEGE and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Amicus Curiae:
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BENNINGTON COLLEGE, ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Edward Plotzker v. Royce Lamberth
as 09-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD D. PLOTZKER, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief United States District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY, Incorporated, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP and others
Plotzker v. Lamberth et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Plotzker
Defendant:
Royce C. Lamberth, American Board of Urology, Inc., Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The George Washington University v. Does et al
as 1:2007cv00555
Plaintiff:
The George Washington University
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does and ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
