Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Duane Montgomery v. United States of America
as 16-6484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Demar Worrell v. Sergeant Spark
as 15-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMAR WORRELL
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VELASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT SPARKS and SERGEANT WINN
Defendant:
WAYNE COUNTY JAIL
Hasty v. Walls et al
as 5:2015ct03123
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Hasty
Defendant:
Corporal Walls, Officer Miller and Wayne County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. McCrory et al
as 5:2015ct03015
Plaintiff:
Adl Bey
Defendant:
Pat McCrory and Wayne County Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. The Jurisdiction of Wayne County
as 5:2014hc02253
Petitioner:
James Carnell Howard
Respondent:
The Jurisdiction of Wayne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montgomery v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014ct03279
Plaintiff:
Duane Montgomery
Defendant:
United States of America, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moody v. Wayne County Municipality
as 5:2014hc02213
Petitioner:
Teddy Alan Moody
Respondent:
Wayne County Municipality
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lieberman v. Goins, et al
as 5:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
Laura Lieberman
Defendant:
Eric Goins , Tyler McNeill , Anitra Peacock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worrell et al v. Sparks et al
as 5:2014ct03092
Plaintiff:
Demar Worrell and Anthony Velasquez
Defendant:
Sparks , Winn and Wayne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLawhorn v. County of Wayne, North Carolina et al
as 5:2013cv00692
Plaintiff:
Billy S. McLawhorn
Defendant:
County of Wayne, North Carolina and Wayne County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
