Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stanley v. Morgan
as 24-30119
Plaintiff:
David Stanley
Defendant:
Scott Morgan, Wayne Griffin, Thomas Glover and others
GRIFFIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14005
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. Morgan et al
as 6:2022cv01655
Plaintiff:
David Earl Stanley and David Stanley
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Thomas Glover, Scott Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GRIFFIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46756
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin et al v. Autoworld Automotive Superstores, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01711
Plaintiff:
Wayne Griffin and Sandra Griffin
Defendant:
Autoworld Automotive Superstores, Inc, Hyundai Capital America, Inc., Autoworld Automotive Superstores, Inc doing business as Lia Hyundai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griffin v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08670
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Research & Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv07207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv01792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
