Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MERRITT v. USA
as 1:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Merritt v. Benton et al
as 5:2023cv06037
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Megan Benton, Thomas Fincham and Abe Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Fincham et al
as 5:2023cv06036
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Thomas Fincham, Abe Shaffer, Megan Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Marquart et al
as 5:2023cv06025
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Keith Marquart, Rebecca Spencer, Patrick Robb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Marquart et al
as 5:2022cv06133
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Keith Marquart, Rebecca Spencer, Patrick Robb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Merritt v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-12052
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL WAYNE MERRITT
Merritt v. Saul
as 4:2021cv01534
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Merritt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Merritt v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv14425
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Commission On Offender Review
Plaintiff:
Paul Wayne Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERRITT v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 4:2020cv00523
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
PAUL WAYNE MERRITT
Respondent:
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul MerrittIn re: Paul Merritt
as 20-13934
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL WAYNE MERRITT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
