Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miles et al v. City of St. George
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
John Miles and Sarah Wei Wu
Defendant:
City of St. George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles et al v. City of St. George
as 2:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
John Miles and Sarah Wei Wu
Defendant:
City of St. George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wei Wu v. David M. Radel
as 8:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Wei Wu
Defendant:
David M. Radel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Fei Fei Fan v. Yan Yao Jiang, et al
as 23-16215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEI FEI FAN
Defendant / Appellee:
YAN YAO JIANG, WEI WU and ZHI ZENG
Wei Wu v. Garland
as 23-666
Petitioner:
XIAN WEI WU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
as 4:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba.com Inc, Jack Yun Ma and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Timothy J Shea and Uttam Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
as 4:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba.com, Inc., Jack Yun Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clark Law Group, PLLC v. Henderson, et al
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Clark Law Group, PLLC
Defendant:
Denise Henderson, American Medical Response, Inc., Southern Hills Hospital and Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interplea
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group, Jack Ma, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
