Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Poronto v. Hoist et al
as 4:2024cv10522
Plaintiff:
Andrew Poronto
Defendant:
T.D. Hoist, Sarah Breen, Kenneth Debus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leschinski v. Canton, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Leschinski
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, OFFICER BRANDON HAYFORD, ALEXIS DIVETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Whiters v. Blaker et al
as 2:2023cv12161
Plaintiff:
Derrick Whiters
Defendant:
Colt Baker, Vinnie Khammo, Brianna Benke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bowser v. Watson et al
as 2:2023cv10568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bowser
Defendant:
Peter Watson, David Shaver, Timothy Ryder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2022cv12827
Plaintiff:
Jay Anderson
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wellpath LLC, Monica Hallac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Wayne, County OF et al
as 2:2022cv12828
Plaintiff:
Jay Anderson
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wellpath LLC, Monica Hallac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2022cv12794
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wellpath LLC, Monica Hallac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Amon Alexander-Hassa Willis
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Erica, Warden Huss, Mark Cavin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Altantawi v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2022cv11906
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Altantawi
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Vicki Warren, Shane Gibson and others
Schmuker v. Deutchman et al
as 2:2022cv10889
Plaintiff:
Amber Schmuker
Defendant:
Cara Deutchman, Sun Yoon Yang, Iesha Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
