Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Winnett v. Well-Path et al
as 3:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Donald Winnett
Defendant:
Well-Path and L G Teague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estell v. Culclager et al
as 4:2025cv00178
Plaintiff:
Derrick Glenn Estell
Defendant:
Aundra Culclager, Miller, Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Well Path Medical et al
as 4:2025cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carl R Thornton, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path Medical, Hayes, Tracy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bledsoe v. Bland et al
as 4:2025cv00070
Plaintiff:
Justin M Bledsoe
Defendant:
Bland, Silakhone and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wardlow v. Allen et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Aston Javon Wardlow
Defendant:
Laura Kelly, Mike Allen, Chris Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Well Path Medical LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00931
Defendant:
Nicole Reddick, Kayla Hargrave, Aundrea F Culcager and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dontae Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00778
Defendant:
Well Path and Sharon Rollans
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster et al v. Thurston et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Randy Sams, Coty Powers, Kandi Cox and others
Defendant:
Joseph Wood, John Thurston, William Luther and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Renfroe v. Celtic Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Renfroe
Defendant:
Celtic Insurance Company doing business as Arkansas Health & Wellness Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Sheila Armstrong, Pierce, Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
