Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Warren v. Schachter et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Esq. Annette Schachter, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneld, Carne & Partners, PLLC, Stephanie Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-1977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIYA CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIYA CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NADINE MOONEY, JENNIFER S. JOHNSON, a/k/a Jennifer Peach and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-466-D-RN
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
