Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Wemmell et al
as 3:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Carlton Wallace
Defendant:
Todd Wemmell and Steven Midford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Bukhari v. Corrections
as 19-577
Defendant:
John Doe, 3, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Barbara Savoie, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Henry Falcone and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Ellen Durko, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Jeremie St. Pierre, All sued in their individual and official capacities, William Faneuff, All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Al-Bukhari v. Department of Correction
as 17-2292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott Semple, Commissioner, all sued in their individual and official capacities, Anne Cournoyer, Individual and Official Capacities, William Mulligan, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, All sued in their individual and official capacities, John Doe, 1, 2, and 3, all sued in their individual and official capacities, Scott Erfe and others
Lopez v. Jahic et al
as 3:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Zactar Jahic, Scott Gorman, Todd Wemmel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Bada et al
as 3:2016cv02285
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Defendant:
Vincente E. Bada, Yolanda G. Bada, HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Al-Bukhari v. Semple et al
as 3:2016cv01428
Plaintiff:
Ja Qure Al-Bukhari
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Anne Cournoyer, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
