Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Joeylynn MesarosIn re: Joeylynn Mesaros
as 23-50593
Petitioner:
In re: Joeylynn Mesaros and Robert Mesaros
Respondent:
Eric Cervini, Wendy Davis, David Gins and others
Dolores ParkIn re: Dolores Park
as 23-50585
Petitioner:
In re: Dolores Park
Respondent:
Eric Cervini, Wendy Davis, David Gins and others
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Wendy Davis, Marva Sadler, Sean Mehl and others
Defendant:
Mistie Sharp, Sadie Weldon, Ashley Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Sharp et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wendy Davis, Marva Sadler, Sean Mehl and others
Defendant:
Mistie Sharp, Sadie Weldon, Ashley Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cervini et al v. Stapp et al
as 1:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Chase Stapp, Rachel Roes, Richard Roes and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cervini et al v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Joeylynn Mesaros, Jane Does, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cervini, Timothy Holloway, Wendy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Wendy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Ritter et al
as 3:2016cv00475
Defendant:
Amini Innovation Corp., Crusader Insurance Company and Frank Ritter
Plaintiff:
Wendy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Davis, et al v. Rick Perry, et al
as 14-50042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WENDY DAVIS, MARC VEASEY, PAT PANGBURN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GOVERNOR RICK PERRY, In His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, JOHN STEEN and STATE OF TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
