Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Borizou v. Olsen-Foxon et al
as 1:2019cv07549
Plaintiff:
Johnny C. Borizou and Johnny C. Borizov
Defendant:
Darwin Williams and Wendy Olsen-Foxon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 8:2016cv00209
Defendant:
Lt. John Doe Nos. 1-2, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Euaristo Aguinaldo and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 3:2016mc00043
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shauntae Robertson v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 13-2474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUNTAE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, PRATHA GHOSH, Doctor, in his official capacity as Medical Director at Stateville Correctional Center, LIPING ZHANG, in her individual and official capacity as on site doctor of Stateville Health Care Unit and others
Barrows v. Olsen-Foxon et al
as 1:2013cv01889
Plaintiff:
Henry Barrows
Defendant:
Wendy Olsen-Foxon, Edward P Matakiewicz and John Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Encarnacion et al
as 1:2012cv10372
Plaintiff:
Kijel Grant
Defendant:
Jennifer Encarnacion, J. Encarnacion, Wendy Olsen-Foxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrows v. Olsen-Foxon et al
as 1:2012cv07862
Plaintiff:
Henry Barrows
Defendant:
Wendy Olsen-Foxon, Edward P Matakiewicz and John Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Schaefer et al
as 1:2011cv06860
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald Schaefer, Brenda Thigpen, Wendy Olsen-Foxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
