Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hollimon v. Citizens Review Board et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Hollimon
Defendant:
Citizens Review Board, Judge Kent J. Dawson, Judge Richard F. Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick v. Luzerne County Correctional Facility West Law Library et al
as 3:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Quincy Michael Patrick
Defendant:
Luzerne County Correctional Facility West Law Library, Luzerne County Correctional Officers, Luzerne County Funding Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. US Attorney General
as 23-50360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Norman
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Attorney General, for the Western District of Texas, Kim Ogg, District Attorney, Harris County, Glenn Hegar, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and others
Norman v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2021cv01024
Defendant:
Thompson Prometric, U.S. Attorney General, Kim Ogg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. West Law et al
as 3:2019cv07163
Defendant:
California Penal Code and West Law
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ceaser Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scotto v. M. Dyer and Son's et al
as 8:2018cv01831
Defendant:
Apple, Warren Buffet Trust, Microsoft and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01782
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scotto v. M. Dyer and Son's et al
as 8:2018cv01664
Defendant:
Larry Page, Microsoft, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scotto v. M. Dyer and Sons et al
as 8:2018cv01663
Defendant:
Apple, Microsoft, United States and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
