Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Puckett v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2010cv00038
Plaintiff:
Willis Puckett
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson, Lance Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bains v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Gurwinder Bains
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson, Robert Paudert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2008cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Hall
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson, Bailey Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chatt et al v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rosie Mae Chatt, Rosie Mae Chatt, Dewayne Chatt, Jr and others
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, Samuel Malone, Steven Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nance et al v. Sammis et al
as 3:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Unseld Nance, Sr, Unseld Nance, Sr, Pamela Farrow and others
Defendant:
Erik Sammis, Jimmy Evans, William Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrow v. Sammis et al
as 3:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Debra Farrow and Debra Farrow
Defendant:
Erik Sammis, Jimmy Ellis, William Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clem v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Viral Clem
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson, Richard Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson et al v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
James C Pearson, Sr and James C Pearson, Jr
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
