Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Burnett, et al v. Prudent Fiduciary Services LLC, et al
as 23-1527
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BURNETT and DAVID NELSON, as individuals and representatives of the Class described herein, and on behalf of the Western Global Airlines, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Defendant / Appellant:
PRUDENT FIDUCIARY SERVICES LLC, MIGUEL PAREDES, JAMES K. NEFF and others
DBA Distribution Services Inc v. Western Global Airlines Inc
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
DBA Distribution Services Inc, a New Jersey corporation and DBA Distribution Services Inc
Defendant:
Western Global Airlines Inc, a Florida corporation and Western Global Airlines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
David Burnett et al v. Prudent Fiduciary Services, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv09681
Plaintiff:
David Burnett and Michael Paradise
Defendant:
Prudent Fiduciary Services, LLC, Miguel Paredes, James K. Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Steven Taracevicz v. Prudent Fiduciary Services, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv09615
Plaintiff:
Steven Taracevicz
Defendant:
Prudent Fiduciary Services, LLC, Miguel Paredes, Western Global Airlines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Flexport, Inc v. Western Global Airlines, LLC
as 1:2019cv06383
Defendant:
Western Global Airlines, LLC
Plaintiff:
Flexport, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd
Marana Aerospace Solutions Incorporated v. Western Global Airlines LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Marana Aerospace Solutions Incorporated
Defendant:
Western Global Airlines LLC , Aircraft Demolition LLC , Jet Yard LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
