Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Guy J. Westmoreland v. USA
as 23-3185
Petitioner:
GUY J. WESTMORELAND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Westmoreland v. Hughes
as 1:2023cv14044
Plaintiff:
Eugene Westmoreland
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Westmoreland v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01840
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Cathy Westmoreland
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Westmoreland v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Eugene Westmoreland
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Westmoreland v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Eugene Westmoreland
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
WESTMORELAND v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK WESTMORELAND and FREDRICK LAMAR WESTMORELAND
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WESTMORELAND et al v. SEYMOUR, INDIANA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 4:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
JESSICA WESTMORELAND and JOHNATHAN HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
SEYMOUR, INDIANA POLICE DEPT., CRYSTAL SCHAPSON, ANTHONY DESENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Westmoreland v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv04330
Plaintiff:
Eugene Westmoreland
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Illinois, E. Arreguin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Guy Westmoreland
as 21-2414
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GUY J. WESTMORELAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
