Cases 1 - 10 of 474
Watson v. Southeast Regional Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Hearing Officer A. Rich, Unit Manager G. Lee, Case Manager FNU Whipple and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chad Hargreaves v. Myrick
as 24-13155
Defendant:
BALDWIN SP WARDEN, VERNON SPEIGHT, BRIAN KEMP and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD HARGREAVES
Darrel Fisher v. Jackson County Missouri Sheriff's Deputies, et al
as 24-2904
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri, Paige A. Wymore-Wynn, Court Executive, US District Court of Missouri, WDMO, Jackson County Missouri Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry Company Inc v. Whipple Industries Inc.
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry Company Inc
Defendant:
Whipple Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry Company Inc v. Whipple Industries Inc.
as 2:2024cv01093
Defendant:
Whipple Industries Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Aluminum Foundry Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jutla v. Acumen Assessments, et al
as 24-3119
Defendant:
PETER GRAHAM, MICHAEL SEELY, ACUMEN ASSESSMENTS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAJNINDER JUTLA
Fisher v. Jackson County Missouri Sheriffs Deputies et al
as 4:2024cv00555
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri Circuit Court, Dean Whipple, Judge Vernon E Scoville, III and others
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Whipple v. Knox County et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Defendant:
Knox County and FNU Whitehead
Plaintiff:
Robert Z Whipple, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv12088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
