Cases 21 - 30 of 667
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marry v. White
as 4:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marry
Defendant:
Doe and Rodney White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Couch v. Taylor et al
as 4:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Justin Hunter Couch
Defendant:
M Taylor, D White, L Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragsdale v. Pate et al
as 4:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Mary Ragsdale
Defendant:
Mark A Pate, James Wyatt, White, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frazier v. Snyder et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Derrick R Frazier
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eastman v. Maloch et al
as 6:2023cv06100
Plaintiff:
Ramon Dewayne Eastman, Sr.
Defendant:
Abigail R. Maloch, Warden White, Major Maclor Otts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. USA
as 4:2023cv00794
Petitioner:
Brandon White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Payne
as 5:2023cv05140
Petitioner:
Christopher Newton White
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. McMullen et al
as 4:2023cv00680
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brady Watson
Defendant:
Ty McMullen and White County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
