Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tabb et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01061
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Tabb, Carter Slusher, Anthony Smalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggins v. Crannford et al
as 1:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail, Officer Whiteside, Lt. Chames and others
Plaintiff:
Jaylin Dwyette Riggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Whiteside (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00942
Plaintiff:
Devoris Williams
Defendant:
Nurse Whiteside , Justin Oden , Nurse Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Eric Starr, Whiteside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2013cv01739
Plaintiff:
David S Whiteside
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whiteside v. Boyd et al
as 2:2009cv01853
Petitioner:
Tywann Lamon Whiteside
Respondent:
Louis Boyd and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quillen v. Howard
as 1:2007cv02291
Plaintiff:
Mary Whiteside Quillen
Defendant:
Mike Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
