Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Riggins v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. Riggins
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Teresa Norman, Mr. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TD Development, LLC v. City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2021cv00296
Defendant:
Steven Dixon, Connie Fitch, Jay Hovey and others
Plaintiff:
TD Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brantley v. Cooks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lerome Brantley
Defendant:
Mary Cooks, Warden Thomas, Captain King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RSUI Indemnity Company v. Whitten et al
as 7:2017cv01779
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Lindsey Renee Whitten, Ryan Austin Craig, Xondadric Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitten v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Sarah Whitten
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Damone v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2014cv02011
Plaintiff:
Tina Whitten Damone
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Whitten v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Wayne Whitten
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Trampoline Parks L.L.C.
as 2:2014cv00975
Plaintiff:
Shanda Whitten
Defendant:
Trampoline Parks L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barley v. Autauga County Commissioners et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
Autauga County Commissioners, James Johnson, Larry Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Sanders et al
as 5:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ray Whitten
Defendant:
Bobby Sanders, Ricky Whitten and Jo Ann Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
