Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brady Leon Spicer
Defendant:
Wilkes County North Carolina, Chris Shew, Jason Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIZZEL v. WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
NYAMBER GRIZZEL
Defendant:
WILKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, DEPUTY C. GREENE, REBECCA JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Wilkes County Courthouse et al
as 5:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Elijah Esaias Pacheco
Defendant:
Wilkes County Courthouse, Wilkes County Jail, Wilkes County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Wilkes County Superior Court et al
as 5:2020cv00100
Petitioner:
Theodore Antonio Ferguson
Respondent:
USA, Wilkes County Superior Court, Wilkes County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mathis v. Shew
as 5:2019cv00009
Respondent:
Wilkes County Sheriff Chris Shew
Petitioner:
Albert Uriah Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gresham v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Jurors, Langstaff, Valdosta, Georgia State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Gresham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. WILKES COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2015cv00748
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON
Defendant:
WILKES COUNTY COURTHOUSE, JULIUS A. NOUSSEAU and SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Wilkes County
as 5:2012cv00139
Petitioner:
Mentu-Hotep: Bey
Respondent:
Wilkes County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
