Cases 21 - 30 of 667
Chesser v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Zachary Adam Chesser
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynne Adams
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. FCI Hazelton Medical Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lacosta Steele
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Medical Staff, Mr Boach, Mrs Resh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Miller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Medina Prue, Leslie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Via v. Reedy
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adam Via
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Reedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Medical Depot, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wilma Lee Adams
Defendant:
Medical Depot, Inc. doing business as Drive Devilbiss Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vonehl v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Vonehl
Defendant:
S. Lovett, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bock v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00322
Petitioner:
Adam N. Bock
Respondent:
Melissa J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
