Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ford v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Ford
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Renata J. Olafson Selzer, Brianna Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abdikarim v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Jesse Jahner, Captain Forbig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rainey v. City of Fargo et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Dione Rainey
Defendant:
City of Fargo, Fargo Police Department, Det. Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Laron Young
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Mandan Police Department, Morton County States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Plaintiff:
Laron Young
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Mandan Police Department, David Bdorndahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horst et al v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
D.J.H., D.X.H., S.J.H. and others
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, United States, Morton, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Postelmans v. Williston, City of et al
as 1:2018cv00214
Defendant:
Williston, City of, Williams County States Attorney, Oren Amund Vallevik and others
Plaintiff:
Renate Evangeline Postelmans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Thompson
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Attorney General of North Dakota, North Dakota State Crime Laboratory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koenig v. Hoeven et al
as 2:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
La Verne Koenig
Defendant:
John Hoeven, Wayne Stenehjem, Adams County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
