Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Pitts v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Gary Kerstein, Tracy Bennett, Emma C Hatchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bennett et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Tracy Bennett, Gary Kerstine, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Benny Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mickey Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitts v. Bennett et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Tracy Bennett, Gary Kerstin, G Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Byrnes et al
as 5:2022cv05039
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
Officer Andrew Byrnes, Officer Phillip Crosby, Officer Page Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
