Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 410
Nicely v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Jerry M Nicely
Defendant: William B Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (DTB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (DTB), John Doe #2 (MAB), John Doe #3 (DJB) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (JEB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01272
Plaintiff: John Doe (JEB)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (TLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01221
Plaintiff: John Doe (TLM)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Meador et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff: William Ray Lee
Defendant: Tim Meador, Dewayne Stone, Josh Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #1 (PTH) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (PTH), John Doe #2 (DMA), John Doe #3 (WCB) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: William B. Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (ADD) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00943
Plaintiff: John Doe (ADD)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?