Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COOPER et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
ERIC RONQUILLO, NATHANIEL PROSSER, NICK COOPER and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTSLAR et al v. CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
DELBERT S. GADDIS, III, AARON MATTINGLY, CODY FIELDS and others
Defendant:
CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv07559
Petitioner:
William Atkins
Respondent:
Jacqueline Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noel, John et al v. HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
John Noel , Tyler Noel , Betsy Brougher and others
Defendant:
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkins v. Salvador Godinez et al
as 1:2008cv04425
Plaintiff:
William Atkins
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Thomas Dart, George Turner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. Moreci et al
as 1:2008cv04381
Plaintiff:
William Atkins
Defendant:
Chief Moreci, Lieutenant Tucker, Sergeant Manos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Atkins v. Does et al
as 1:2008cv03448
Plaintiff:
William Atkins
Defendant:
Jhon Does, Jhon Does, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neuman v. United States Government et al
as 3:2007cv00362
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Illinois, City of Peoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Atkins v. Devine et al
as 1:2007cv02064
Plaintiff:
William Atkins
Defendant:
Ken Walker and Linda Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neuman v. United States Government et al
as 1:2007cv01107
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Illinois, City of Peoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
