Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert Gene RegaIn re: Robert Gene Rega
as 20-1377
Respondent:
GRIM, WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE, FNU VANDIVNER and others
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Rafael Chieke v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3789
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY MUSSER, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFAEL K. CHIEKE
Charles Brown v. William Sprenkle, et al
as 19-3200
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, LORI LYONS, JEROME WALSH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD BROWN
Brown v. Lyons et al
as 3:2015cv01981
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Lori Lyons, Jerome Walsh, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMISON v. BEARD et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
DASHAWN L. JAMISON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, J. BARRY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Camp Hill et al
as 3:2010cv02612
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Camp Hill, Central Office Executive Staff, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
James Paluch, Jr. v. Jeffery Beard, et al
as 10-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, JOHN S. SHAFFER, WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
DENNIS P. DURANT
POWE v. MEYERS et al
as 2:2009cv05580
Plaintiff:
KENT POWE
Defendant:
ANNE MEYERS, SUSAN FARRARO, F. CAMPOPIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paluch v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
James A. Paluch, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, John S. Shaffer, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
