Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, MARY S. MCELROY, Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School, et al
as 21-1435
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Justice of the United States District Court as Chair of the RWU Law Board of Directors, OLIVIA MILONAS, MICHAEL YELONSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH, and similarly situated persons
Silva v. Smith, et al
as 21-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
C. J. WYATT, in is Individual and Official Capacity as a U.S. Marshal Supervisor, JOHN F. MCBURNEY, III, in his Individual and Official Capacity as a RI State Magistrate Judge, US MARSHALS DANGEROUS FUGITIVES TASK FORCE, in their Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD J. SILVA
William Smith v. Lance Bonds, et al
as 20-1818
Defendant / Appellee:
Green, John Doe, Stone County District Court, Lance Bonds, Stone County, Arkansas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William E. Smith
Steven Wayne Bonilla v. William Smith, et al
as 20-55394
Defendant / Appellee:
L. QUENTIN SMITH, GERALD B. DIEDICH, ERIC CHRISTENSEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA
William E. Smith v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv03319
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07265
Plaintiff:
CHECKER CAB PHILADELPHIA, INC. , AF TAXI, INC. , AG TAXI, INC. and others
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRAVIS KALANICK, JON FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
William E. Smith, et al. v. Rapid American Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-64705
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
United States v. William E. Smith
as 10-1991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William E. Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
