Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03505
Plaintiff:
Martin Gardner Reiffin
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation , William H. Gates, III and Steven A. Ballmer
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Arelious Muckle v. UNCF, et al
as 10-13122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARELIOUS MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNCF, a.k.a. United Negro College Fund, BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION, a.k.a. Gates Foundation, DR. MICHAEL LOMAX, CEO of UNCF, individually and in his official capacity and others
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009cv02387
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Muckle v. UNCF et al
as 1:2009mi00335
Plaintiff:
Arelious Muckle
Defendant:
UNCF, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Michael Lomax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Giorgis v. Blake et al
as 2:2009cv00215
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Francis S. Blake, Home Depot USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Araya Wolde Giorgis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Sinegal et al
as 2:2008cv01450
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust
Defendant:
James D Sinegal, Jeffrey H Brotman, Richard A Galanti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cullom v. Gates
as 2:2007cv01640
Plaintiff:
Paul C Cullom, Jr
Defendant:
William H Gates, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Riches v. Gates et al
as 2:2007cv01480
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
William H Gates, Steven A Ballmer, Melinda F Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cullom v. Gates et al
as 2:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Paul C Cullom, Jr
Defendant:
William H Gates, III, City of Kent, Sherriff of King Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
