Cases 21 - 30 of 49
LR Trust v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01622
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Farino v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02712
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
frank FARINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Parshall v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01277
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Wang v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02241
Defendant:
Donna S. Morea, William H. Rogers, Jr., David M. Ratcliffe and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
LR Trust v. William Rogers, Jr., et al
as 17-14635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LR TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. ROGERS, JR., PAUL R. GARCIA, M. DOUGLAS IVESTER and others
:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
Case name not on file
as 3:2017mc00005
Movant:
Jorge Arrieta , Harold Bitler , Mimi Breeden and others
LR Trust v. Rogers et al
as 1:2016cv04132
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr., Paul R. Garcia, Douglas M. Ivester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarlett v. The County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv05418
Plaintiff:
Sidney Theodore Scarlett
Defendant:
The County of Santa Clara, The Santa Clara County, Jeffrey F. Rosen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN et al v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv02965
Defendant:
Suntrust Banks, Inc. , SUNTRUST BANKS INC. BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , SUNTRUST BANKS INC. BENEFITS FINANCE COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE BROWN , ELAINE JEFFERSON , BARBARA A. KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rogers v. Dellwo et al
as 1:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
William H. Rogers
Defendant:
Cynthia G. Dellwo, Sherburne County Health & Human Services, Mary Jo Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
