Cases 61 - 70 of 153
GAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04194
Plaintiff:
WILMER B. GAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT D. SHANNON, WILLIAM K. SUTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilmer B Gay v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2011cv05193
Defendant:
Board of Pardons, City of Philadelphia, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Wilmer B Gay
Deborah Wilson v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-71600
Petitioner:
DEBORAH WILSON
Respondent:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, individually and in her capacity as secretary to the United States department of health and human services, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Individually and in his capacity as secretary to the United States department of the treasurey and the United States of America, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, individually and in his capacity as commissioner of the social security administration and others
Santos v. Harmon et al
as 4:2011cv02178
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Pita Santos
Defendant:
Melinda Harmon, David J Bradley, William K Suter and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Ian L Cormier v. William K Suter et al
as 5:2011cv00801
Defendant:
M Blalock and William K Suter
Plaintiff:
Ian L Cormier
Askew v. Suter
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ASKEW
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and KYLE R. RATLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Askew v. Suter
as 5:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
Anthony Askew
Defendant:
William K. Suter and Kyle R. Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adam Flores v. William K. Suter, et al
as 11-1746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adam Flores
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter and Clayton R. Higgins
Vance Johnson v. William Suter, et al
as 11-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vance Edward Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk and Gail Johnson, Deputy Clerk
JOHNSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER and GAIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
