Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Petrey v. Barlett et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Plaintiff:
William Royal Petrey
Defendant:
Recardo Smith, Robert Sanders, Hon. Judge Gregory Barlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Margetis, et al v. William Furgeson, Jr., et al
as 16-40563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MARGETIS and ALAN E. BARON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE WILLIAM ROYAL FURGESON, JR., STACEY G. C. JERNIGAN and JOHN BARRON
John Margetis, et al v. William Furgeson, Jr., et al
as 14-40080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MARGETIS and ALAN E. BARON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE WILLIAM ROYAL FURGESON, JR., STACEY G. C. JERNIGAN, LUKE CHASTAIN and others
Floyd v. City of New York
as 13-3088
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer Rodriguez, in his official capacity, New York Police Officer Moran, in his individual capacity, Raymond Kelly, Commissioner New York City Police, in his individual and official capacity and others
Petitioner:
James Sample, Associate Professor, Hofstra Law School, Rudolph W. Giuliani, Richard J. Holwell, Esq. and others
Intervenor:
Detectives' Endowment Association, Inc., Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Lieutenants Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lalit Clarkson, David Ourlicht, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, David Floyd and others
Defendant / Appellant:
City of New York
Margetis et al v. Furgeson et al
as 4:2012cv00753
Plaintiff:
John Margetis and Alan E Baron
Defendant:
William Royal Furgeson, Jr, Stacey G.C. Jernigan, Luke Chastain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Margetis et al v. Barron, et al
as 4:2012cv00686
Defendant:
William Royal Furgeson, Jr , Stacey G.C. Jernigan , Lucien Chastain and others
Plaintiff:
John Margetis and Alan E Baron
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
