Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States v. Santiago
as 24-6015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER WILLIAM SANTIAGO
SANTIAGO JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24959
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SANTIAGO JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Adkins et al
as 2:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
William Santiago
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Rob Jeffreys, J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv11637
Defendant:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santiago v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00728
Plaintiff:
William Santiago
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alvarez et al v. Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02413
Defendant:
Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc., Dr. Yorlene Hevia, Dr. Carlos Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Hugo Audberto Alvarez and Conjugal Partnership constituted by him and his wife
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago-Ortiz v. Wood et al
as 4:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
William Santiago-Ortiz
Defendant:
Dick Wood and American National Red Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Santiago v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 13-4021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SANTIAGO
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY
Santiago v. Seavers et al
as 3:2013cv00966
Plaintiff:
William Santiago
Defendant:
C/O Seavers, Burnett, Ms Aindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
