Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hall v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Hall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hall v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Hall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lush v. Lush et al
as 3:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
William S. Lush, Virginia Briganti Lush, William Stephen Lush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lush, William v. J. et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Lush, II
Defendant:
Joie, Lt. Scott Moen, City Of Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz-O'Neill v. Municipality of Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
Jaime A. Diaz-O'Neill
Defendant:
Municipality of Carolina, FNU Figueroa, Ruben Moyeno-Cintron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv50421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela v. Collier et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn et al v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Michael Solan , Det Wendy McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Glenn Sr and Darryl Keith Pinkins Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brumlow v. Hamilton County et al (RLJ2)
as 1:2016cv00394
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee , Hamilton County Sheriff's Department , Jim Hammond and others
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Brumlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
