Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Eliot Stacy v. Whittington Motors Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03700
Plaintiff:
Eliot Stacy
Defendant:
Wires Only, inc., R.D. Whittington, Whittington Motor Sports, Inc. doing business as Wires Only and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
WHITTINGTON III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44025
Plaintiff:
BERT WILLIAM WHITTINGTON III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2020cv03067
Defendant:
Lt. Luis Munguia, Sgt. Patrick Smith, Colonel Lamar Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Lisette Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2018cv08944
Defendant:
Richard Berger, Detective Randall Kuhn, Scott Zemlik and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasscock v. Mt. Orab Village of et al
as 1:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
John R. Glasscock
Defendant:
Mt. Orab Village of, George Baker, Ryan Gergory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sankofa v. Normand et al
as 2:2015cv01679
Plaintiff:
Yimlah S Sankofa
Defendant:
Newell Normand, Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, George Kister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00972
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roberts v. The Ferguson Unit et al
as 6:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Whittington Roberts
Defendant:
The Ferguson Unit and Director of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. The Ferguson Unit et al
as 1:2010cv00179
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ, The Boyd Unit and The Ferguson Unit
Plaintiff:
William Whittington Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roberts v. The Boyd Unit et al
as 6:2010cv00101
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ and The Boyd Unit
Plaintiff:
William Whittington Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
