Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 6:2011cv00198
Petitioner:
William Richard Hamilton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Esch v. Smelser et al
as 1:2010cv02906
Petitioner:
William Richard Esch
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and Aristedes Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William Hunt v. Leroy Cartledge
as 10-7315
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHARD HUNT
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY CARTLEDGE
Iverson v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2010cv02169
Petitioner:
William Richard Iverson
Respondent:
Minnesota, State of and Cal R. Ludeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunt v. Cartledge
as 0:2009cv01444
Petitioner:
William Richard Hunt
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton et al v. Lancia et al
as 3:2009cv00294
Plaintiff:
Charles Clayton, Michael G. Campbell, Shawn Michael Hartford and others
Defendant:
Christine A. Lancia, Randall S. Pitcher and Donald M. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Richard Iverson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 08-3652
Petitioner - Appellant:
William Richard Iverson
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Minnesota and Warden Jessica Symmes
William Richard Iverson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 08-1542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Richard Iverson
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Corrections, Mental Health and Correctional Officials, Washington County Court Judges and others
William Richard Iverson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 08-1184
Petitioner - Appellant:
William Richard Iverson
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Minnesota and Warden Jessica Symmes
Iverson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2007cv04710
Plaintiff:
William Richard Iverson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Mental Health and Correctional Officials, Washington County Court Judge(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
