Cases 1 - 10 of 15
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Bolden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Willie Bolden, IV
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bolden
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Willie Bolden, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bolden v. Allison et al
as 4:2022cv02059
Plaintiff:
Willie Bolden
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Willie Bolden v. S. Arana
as 20-16161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE BOLDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
S. ARANA
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bolden v. Arana
as 5:2017cv05607
Plaintiff:
Willie Bolden
Defendant:
O. Arana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
