Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson v. Colonial Penn Life Insurance Company et al.
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Willie Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Colonial Penn Life Insurance Company, Mark Hard doing business as MBH Resource Group and GenFed Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
USA v. Charles Jackson, Jr.
as 21-30044
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIE JACKSON, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Jackson, Jr.
as 21-30045
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIE JACKSON, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Ercole
as 12-5024
Petitioner - Appellant:
Willie Jackson, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Ercole
In re: Willie Jackson, Jr., et al
as 11-8017
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Willie Jackson, Jr., Individually and on behalf of a class of agrieved persons as discrived herein
:
, , and others
Jackson v. Ercole
as 11-2970
Petitioner - Appellant:
Willie Jackson, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Ercole
Jackson v. Ercole
as 1:2009cv01054
Petitioner:
Willie Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Ercole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv30189
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JACKSON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90062
Plaintiff:
THELMA JACKSON, THELMA JACKSON, WILLIE JACKSON, JR. and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
