Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Jamieson et al v. Alvaro et al
as 6:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Jamieson and Deidra Janee Wills
Defendant:
Chad K. Alvaro and Christine E. Arendas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Wills v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2024cv02764
Plaintiff:
Ruben Wills
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Joseph Morrissey and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wills v. Howard et al
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Damien Wills
Defendant:
C Howard, TD Brown, T Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HMI - Wills Point, LLC v. Wills Point, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
HMI - Wills Point, LLC
Defendant:
Wills Point, Texas and Pam Pearson
Wills v. Weaver Police Department, The et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Tacarius Willis and Tacarius Wills
Defendant:
Weaver Police Department, The, Nicholas Quinn, Calhoun County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nasir v. Nasir et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Malik Nasir
Defendant:
Naima Nasir, Register of Wills, Court of Chancery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant:
Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
