Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brent, et al. vs. Wexford, et al.
as 1:2019cv01212
Defendant:
Alfonso David, Andrew Tilden, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Joe N Sherrod, Michael Brent, John Theis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter, et al. vs. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al.
as 1:2017cv03546
Plaintiff:
Leander Carter , Michael Brent , Willie Johnson and others
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Alfonso David, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Conference USA et al
as 1:2016cv09979
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
Conference USA, The National Collegiate Athletic Association and American Athletic Conference
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. CONFERENCE USA et al
as 1:2016cv02341
Defendant:
BIG EAST CONFERENCE, CONFERENCE USA and THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hanks v. McGarvey et al
as 1:2016cv02471
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hanks
Defendant:
Jenny L McGarvey, Karen Rabideau, Terri Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv04770
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Williams
Defendant:
S. A. Godinez, Willie Johnson and Lt. Vaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Willie Johnson
as 1:2013cv00616
In_re:
Willie Johnson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv03095
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, D. Devance, S. Goldenaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
