Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Jugs Sports, Inc.
as 1:2012cv09908
Plaintiff:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Defendant:
Jugs Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
STEPHAN v. WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO. et al
as 1:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
DAVID STEPHAN
Defendant:
TRUE TEMPER SPORTS INC and WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. PSI 91, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07150
Plaintiff:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Defendant:
PSI 91, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Patent Research Institute LLC v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 6:2011cv00476
Plaintiff:
Patent Research Institute LLC
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., The Clorox Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 6:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC., The Clorox Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson Sporting Goods Co v. Prince Sports, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02524
Plaintiff:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co
Defendant:
Prince Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Baden Sports, Inc. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
as 2:2011cv00603
Plaintiff:
Baden Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
Baden Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Athco, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv03155
Plaintiff:
Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
Defendant:
Athco, Inc and Athco Imports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA Baseball et al. v. City of New York
as 1:2007cv03605
Plaintiff:
USA Baseball, USA Baseball, USA Baseball and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
