Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Pacheco v. Stearns
as 24-10938
Defendant:
FNU Winger, Physician, FCI Big Spring, FNU Marquez, Nurse, FCI Big Spring, FNU Villa, Housing Unit Officer, FCI Big Spring and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Pacheco
Cross-Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Winger v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv24011
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line
Plaintiff:
Dina Winger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Seaman Complaint
Winger v. AT&T Inc
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dina Winger
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jando #364595 v. Winger et al
as 1:2024cv01019
Defendant:
Unknown Treptow, Unknown Brege, Unknown Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jando #364595
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01928
Defendant:
Lt Cavon, John/Jane Doe 4, Jeffery Olsen and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Winger v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv01797
Plaintiff:
Dina Winger
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Winger v. AT&T Inc
as TXN/3:24-cv-01797
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Plaintiff:
Dina Winger
Interested Party:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Navarrete #459086 v. Hariman et al
as 1:2024cv00660
Defendant:
Unknown Winger, E. Hariman and J. Kludy
Plaintiff:
Randal Alan Navarrete #459086
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning #251889 v. Schiebner et al
as 1:2024cv00578
Defendant:
Jeanine Winger, J. Kludy and James Schiebner
Plaintiff:
Corey Manning #251889
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heflin #483317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Defendant:
C. Barnes, Jeremy Bush, J. Kludy and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Heflin #483317
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
