Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bakha Yawuti El v. City of Myrtle Beach
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKHA YAWUTI EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GIOSA and others
London v. Miller et al
as 4:2017cv04165
Plaintiff:
Laura London
Defendant:
Darrell Miller, Steve Smith, Scott Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Kesse et al
as 4:2012cv04120
Plaintiff:
Roger B. King
Defendant:
Jess Kesse, Paul Schueth, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 4:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowty v. Kesse et al
as 4:2012cv04016
Plaintiff:
Earl David Dowty
Defendant:
Jess Kesse, Paul Schueth, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. Schroeder et al
as 4:2011cv04088
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Olson
Defendant:
Chip Schroeder, Winner City Jail Administrators, Paul Schueth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez. v. Tripp County et al
as 3:2009cv03006
Plaintiff:
Rogue Verdoza Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tripp County, Chip Schroeder, Paul Schueth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Wolf et al
as 4:2007cv04184
Plaintiff:
Heath Taylor
Defendant:
Charlie Daman Wolf, Winner City Jail and Richard Bertram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Hanig v. City of Winner
as 07-2022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tony Hanig
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Winner
Defendant:
Winner City Council, Marsha Ray Risseeuw, Winner City Council Member, Tim Meiners, Winner City Council Member and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
