Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hamphill-Wooten v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00567
Petitioner:
Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamphill-Wooten v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv00466
Petitioner:
Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wooten v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03704
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Steve Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04321
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wooten v. Schmit et al
as 2:2016cv04554
Defendant:
Unknown Schmit, Unknown Moore and Unknown Karas
Plaintiff:
AD Emmanuel Wooten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Alvin Rex Smith
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Kenneth Skiff, Amanda Herman Gotjen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2013cv08261
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wooten
Defendant:
Flagstaff, City of, Robert Bruce Wallace, Grant P Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamali v. Low et al
as 2:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Stephanie Danica Low, William Moore, Michael W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamali v. Hyatt et al
as 2:2012cv02702
Plaintiff:
Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant:
Emma Hyatt, Amy Jane Hyatt, David Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Woehler v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 2:2011cv01088
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woehler
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Unknown Party, ReconTrust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
