Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Jose Luis Mancilla Gonzalez et al v. United State Postal Service et al
as 2:2015cv01415
Defendant:
Does, United State Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Maria Espinoza, Jose Luis Mancilla Gonzalez, A. M. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Y. M. v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Y. M. and Rocio Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 1309, AF-CIO v. Y & M Construction Inc
as 2:2014cv07860
Petitioner:
Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 1309, AF-CIO
Respondent:
Y & M Construction Inc
Jiali Tang v. Synutra International, Inc.
as 10-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIALI TANG, YONGDE LIU, in their own capacities, and ex rel. X. L. a minor, PING MU and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SYNUTRA INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and SYNUTRA, INCORPORATED, a/k/a American St. George Biological Techonology Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Y & M Construction Inc
as 2:2013cv08844
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant:
Y & M Construction Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Standard Homes Plan Service, Inc. v. Young, et al
as 5:2013cv00755
Plaintiff:
Standard Homes Plan Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Bernard F. Young and Y & M Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Third Estate LLC v. Y M Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06408
Defendant:
Does and Y M Inc
Plaintiff:
Third Estate LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
