Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Carleton v. Liberty, et al
as 23-1541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BEARCE, MARIE LANDRY, ROBERT YOUNG and others
Carleton v. Young, et al
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT YOUNG, MARIE LANDRY, PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL and others
CARLETON v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY, ERIC BEARCE, MARIE LANDRY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLETON v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant:
ROBERT YOUNG, JA MARIE LANDRY, PISCATAQUIS COUNTY JAIL and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv10869
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frady v. Youngs et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Respondent:
J Patrick Youngs, III and State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Thomas V. Frady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv10226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General and United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2019cv00527
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
Lee Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv10821
Defendant:
Consolidated Legal Center, Cynthia Young, US Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Lt Taylor et al
as 1:2019cv10375
Defendant:
Cynthia A. Young, Lt Taylor and Legal Center
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
