Cases 21 - 30 of 81
MOET v. UNITED STATES MILITARY et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
NENNEH SESAY MOET
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MILITARY, ROCNATION, CVS/DELCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman v. Blick et al
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Francisco Guzman
Defendant:
Shawn Blick, Ruben Gallego, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taebel v. Google Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00921
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Google Inc and Youtube LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trump et al v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv08009
Plaintiff:
President Donald J. Trump, Kelly Victory, Austen Fletcher and others
Defendant:
YouTube LLC and Sundar Pichai
Interested Party:
Ted Kurt, United States of America, Twitter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Taebel v. Google, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Respondent:
Google, Inc. and Youtube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Belknap v. Google et al
as 1:2021cv22732
Plaintiff:
Craig Belknap
Defendant:
Google, Facebook, Twitter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
SESCEY v. YOUTUBE et al
as 2:2021cv03311
Plaintiff:
NENNET AKAY SESCEY
Defendant:
YOUTUBE and LEGAL SUPPORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom Watch, Inc. v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22614
Plaintiff:
Freedom Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Sundar Pichai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trump et al v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22445
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Trump, Kelly Victory, Austen Fletcher and others
Defendant:
YouTube, LLC and Sundar Pichai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
