Cases filed in Alabama
Pleasant v. Yescare (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Ray Dean Pleasant
Defendant: Yescare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Garner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: James Isiah Macon
Defendant: Sergeant Garner, Medical Staff and YesCare Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Rebecca Crafton
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson et al v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Plaintiff: Audrey Marie Dotson and Audrey South
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Greg Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff: Dewon Clarniel Jones
Defendant: YesCare Corp. and Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmore v. YesCare Corp. et al (INMATE 4) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff: George Washington Palmore
Defendant: YesCare Corp., Tahir Siddiq, David Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hensley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff: Jason K. Hensley
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Wilcotte Rahming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?