Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. Ayers (Harrell)
as 26-1478
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Ayers (Wright)
as 26-1420
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Weston v. BJH Holdings III Corp et al
as 2:2025cv01951
Plaintiff:
Yetta Weston
Defendant:
BJH Holdings III Corp and Jack's Family Restaurants LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Weston v. BJH Holding Corp et al
as 1:2025cv08861
Plaintiff:
Yetta Weston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tn Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Cravey v. Jack's Family Restaurants LP et al
as 2:2025cv01861
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cravey, Yetta Weston, Jamie Tanner and others
Defendant:
Jack's Family Restaurants LP and BJH Holdings III Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McGee v. Cain et al
as 1:2025cv00304
Plaintiff:
Roderick McGee
Defendant:
Chasity Cain, Sonja Brooks, Robert D Philyaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Clarke)
as 25-1869
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, NIA GOVAN, BERMON CLARKE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A.P. v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 4:2025cv05882
Plaintiff:
A.P.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Lorianna Barnhill, Sarah Farnan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
Delbert Akers et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04957
Plaintiff:
Delbert Akers, Mark Alcorn, Lori Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
