Cases 1 - 10 of 20
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv01228
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BROOKS
Defendant:
ORLANDO L. HARPER, LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DAVID ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, MAJOR ADAM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JUBECK v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv00072
Defendant:
JASON BEASOM, MICHELLE GILDEA, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JUBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALKER et al v. RAIBLE et al
as 2:2020cv01868
Defendant:
JASON BEASOM, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
LAVONNA DORSEY, APRIL WALKER and ALEXUS DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORRIS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv01639
Plaintiff:
BIANCA MORRIS
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00670
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
Defendant:
JASON BEASOM, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RHODES, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOODS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, WAINWRIGHT, PRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. GIRIOUX et al
as 1:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
MAURICE STEVENS
Defendant:
NANCY A. GIRIOUX, DORINA VARNER, TRACY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
